A no brainer answer to allegation that UM was at low ebb even decades ago.
Divani
http://taknakghauth.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/alumni-um-tersinggung-kenyataan-naib-canselor/
08/02/2012 at 1:01 pm
Ghauth is either naive and/or stupid. His statement about UM was never any good in particular during Ungku Aziz as a VC merely manifests his inability to articulate let alone arguing as an academician or a professor worse still as a VC. His statement of degrading UM for its past reveals two major errors in his reasoning.
(i) Shallow definition of impact. Publication of ISI journal is no panacea to social problem or economic development which Malaysia desperately chasing after. Impact of ISI publications are limited – mainly in terms of number of citations. Lately – due to demands of this publications, thousands of fake articles have been published by local academics in the west to improve ranking. Unlike before, most of these papers are void of societal concerns. They are churned out purely for numbers’ sake. Very unlikely that these fake papers produce impact on societal improvements.
But, through his research Ungku Azis has revolutionised the savings of the poor to become capital investment to plough back to the rural economy to extricate them out of poverty. His concept of Tabung Haji is one of its kind in the world and it has contributed to a more organised “haj” industry. The tabung helped the poor to perform the haj without becoming poorer after sacrificing their lands or assets to the money lenders to finance the trip. His contribution is beyond billion ringgits worth, but creating an equitable development for the country and bringing the poor into the mainstream of economic activities. Had it not for him, the poor will remain impoverished and victimised by the moneylenders with exorbitant rate of interest. We have not taken into account the multiplier effect of his innovation to the economy.
(ii) Inability to make an intelligent temporal comparison. One is shallow if one uses the standard in the C21st to measure the performance in the 1950s. We cannot say the professors in the 1950s were slow in calculating the coefficients in the regression analysis compared to now. Simply because the technology was not available then. Similarly, he cannot use the ISI criteria on professors in the 1950s as then, they were busy laying the foundation for the future of academic in the country. Steve Jobs did not have ISI publications but he changed the world. So are other great men in human history; Ghandi, Rumi and others. Temporal comparison should take into account the variables in the era that one chooses. Period.
What a blunder.
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Friday, February 3, 2012
Minut-init again
http://minutspaceinit.blogspot.com/
http://test.juiceonline.com/venues/minut-init-studio-galleria/
Young art at work.Let their minds, heart n soul explore the beauty of the Creation inside out,black n white and all its spectrum and grandeur. Within, we hope they'll find the inner force that may pacify greeds and insanity that destroy kindness n purity to its core. Well done Minut-init: Nominated as "Best art venue,2011" by Juice.
http://test.juiceonline.com/venues/minut-init-studio-galleria/
Young art at work.Let their minds, heart n soul explore the beauty of the Creation inside out,black n white and all its spectrum and grandeur. Within, we hope they'll find the inner force that may pacify greeds and insanity that destroy kindness n purity to its core. Well done Minut-init: Nominated as "Best art venue,2011" by Juice.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Its time for new Green Revolution II
Fatimah Mohamed Arshad (2011). Green Revolution: Face up to New Challenges, New Straits Times, 23 June.
http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18green/Article/index_html
IT is time to initiate a "Green Revolution 2" after a long lull following the success of the Green Revolution (GR) of the 1960s and 1970s.
The original GR revolutionised padi production in Asia, alleviating farmers from the productivity trap while poor consumers benefited from an abundant supply of rice.
Some countries in Asia, including Malaysia, were able to enjoy a reasonable degree of food security, particularly in rice. Productivity enhancement was the order then.
After the 2008 food crisis, "food security" is once again the buzzword in Malaysia.
The World Food Summit in 1996 defined food security as existing when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meet their dietary needs and food preferences.
The GR developed new varieties of rice that were more resistant to pests and diseases, and improved taste and grain quality.
The success of GR in Malaysia began with the realisation that investment in increasing agricultural productivity was a prerequisite to economic development, including food security.
This vision was translated into research and development (R&D) in enhancing rice productivity and infrastructure by public agencies.
The move was proven right as indicated by the increase in productivity, farmers' income and consumers' welfare.
Despite these successes, the downside of GR are potentially serious. The technology developed in the 1970s may no longer be relevant in the current environment.
After four decades of GR application (with minimal modifications), the intensification of agriculture and chemical input has led to environmental degradation, increased salinity and pesticide misuse.
In particular, the excessive use of pesticides is destroying the environment. Lately, frequent weather and natural hazards have made climate change an important variable in the supply equation. The GR has already run its course.
The investment in rice has been lopsided towards protectionist measures to ensure producers achieve the self-sufficiency target set rather than for "productive" purposes, particularly increasing productivity and adding value.
Protectionist measures include price control (such as a guaranteed minimum price), cash and input subsidies, market regulations and import controls.
Between 2000 and 2009, the government dished out RM9 billion in subsidies to the industry to achieve 65 to 70 per cent self-sufficiency in rice production.
The allocation for R&D is a meagre percentage of this value.
As proven elsewhere, interventionist measures are distortive, economically inefficient and a huge burden on the government and taxpayers.
Despite all these, the strategy is able to ensure a relatively stable supply of rice. But this trade-off is a costly one indeed.
The investment in food in general has been reduced significantly as imports are much cheaper than if they are to be grown locally.
The downward trend in public investment in the food sector has not been matched by a concomitant rise in private investments. The private sector investments were mainly concentrated on industrial crops, such as oil palm and agribusiness ventures.
While the food sector is being marginalised by the government and private sector, the demand for food continues to increase because of population and income growth.
The implications in changes in the consumption sector were overlooked by many.
Food demand is influenced by population growth, urbanisation, income and associated changes in dietary preferences.
As income grows, consumers shift their diet from one largely dependent on rice to a more diversified diet comprising meat, milk, fruits, vegetables and processed foods.
These needs are met through imports that are increasing , resulting in large deficits about RM11 billion last year.
In the last three decades, Malaysia's rice import has hovered around 30 per cent of the local requirement.
In the short term, Malaysia has enough foreign exchange to import rice and other food items, but in the long term, this strategy may not hold any more.
Without major breakthroughs, demand could easily outstrip the overly stressed supply sector. There is evidence of resource overuse.
Rice production will have to address several major challenges. Water, for one, will become a major constraining factor because the quality and quantity of water will decline as a result of pollution, forest degradation, and increased agricultural, domestic and industrial use.
Continuous urbanisation would lead to loss of padi land to residential and industrial development and a decline in the number of workers.
Overuse of chemical fertilisers and pesticides reduces soil fertility and water quality and harms the environment.
Thus, an increase in rice production would have to be achieved by using less water, labour and cultivated land. This requires new varieties with high yield potential, water use efficiency and better resistance to pests and diseases.
These challenges have to be addressed by modern science such as biotechnology.
To institute a radical change in rice productivity, a new green revolution is imperative. It must achieve a new objective, that is productivity that is sustainable to the environment and mankind. And, it should start now.
Read more: Green Revolution: Face up to new challenges http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18green/Article/index_html#ixzz1U0ZKPnz0
http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18green/Article/index_html
IT is time to initiate a "Green Revolution 2" after a long lull following the success of the Green Revolution (GR) of the 1960s and 1970s.
The original GR revolutionised padi production in Asia, alleviating farmers from the productivity trap while poor consumers benefited from an abundant supply of rice.
Some countries in Asia, including Malaysia, were able to enjoy a reasonable degree of food security, particularly in rice. Productivity enhancement was the order then.
After the 2008 food crisis, "food security" is once again the buzzword in Malaysia.
The World Food Summit in 1996 defined food security as existing when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meet their dietary needs and food preferences.
The GR developed new varieties of rice that were more resistant to pests and diseases, and improved taste and grain quality.
The success of GR in Malaysia began with the realisation that investment in increasing agricultural productivity was a prerequisite to economic development, including food security.
This vision was translated into research and development (R&D) in enhancing rice productivity and infrastructure by public agencies.
The move was proven right as indicated by the increase in productivity, farmers' income and consumers' welfare.
Despite these successes, the downside of GR are potentially serious. The technology developed in the 1970s may no longer be relevant in the current environment.
After four decades of GR application (with minimal modifications), the intensification of agriculture and chemical input has led to environmental degradation, increased salinity and pesticide misuse.
In particular, the excessive use of pesticides is destroying the environment. Lately, frequent weather and natural hazards have made climate change an important variable in the supply equation. The GR has already run its course.
The investment in rice has been lopsided towards protectionist measures to ensure producers achieve the self-sufficiency target set rather than for "productive" purposes, particularly increasing productivity and adding value.
Protectionist measures include price control (such as a guaranteed minimum price), cash and input subsidies, market regulations and import controls.
Between 2000 and 2009, the government dished out RM9 billion in subsidies to the industry to achieve 65 to 70 per cent self-sufficiency in rice production.
The allocation for R&D is a meagre percentage of this value.
As proven elsewhere, interventionist measures are distortive, economically inefficient and a huge burden on the government and taxpayers.
Despite all these, the strategy is able to ensure a relatively stable supply of rice. But this trade-off is a costly one indeed.
The investment in food in general has been reduced significantly as imports are much cheaper than if they are to be grown locally.
The downward trend in public investment in the food sector has not been matched by a concomitant rise in private investments. The private sector investments were mainly concentrated on industrial crops, such as oil palm and agribusiness ventures.
While the food sector is being marginalised by the government and private sector, the demand for food continues to increase because of population and income growth.
The implications in changes in the consumption sector were overlooked by many.
Food demand is influenced by population growth, urbanisation, income and associated changes in dietary preferences.
As income grows, consumers shift their diet from one largely dependent on rice to a more diversified diet comprising meat, milk, fruits, vegetables and processed foods.
These needs are met through imports that are increasing , resulting in large deficits about RM11 billion last year.
In the last three decades, Malaysia's rice import has hovered around 30 per cent of the local requirement.
In the short term, Malaysia has enough foreign exchange to import rice and other food items, but in the long term, this strategy may not hold any more.
Without major breakthroughs, demand could easily outstrip the overly stressed supply sector. There is evidence of resource overuse.
Rice production will have to address several major challenges. Water, for one, will become a major constraining factor because the quality and quantity of water will decline as a result of pollution, forest degradation, and increased agricultural, domestic and industrial use.
Continuous urbanisation would lead to loss of padi land to residential and industrial development and a decline in the number of workers.
Overuse of chemical fertilisers and pesticides reduces soil fertility and water quality and harms the environment.
Thus, an increase in rice production would have to be achieved by using less water, labour and cultivated land. This requires new varieties with high yield potential, water use efficiency and better resistance to pests and diseases.
These challenges have to be addressed by modern science such as biotechnology.
To institute a radical change in rice productivity, a new green revolution is imperative. It must achieve a new objective, that is productivity that is sustainable to the environment and mankind. And, it should start now.
Read more: Green Revolution: Face up to new challenges http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18green/Article/index_html#ixzz1U0ZKPnz0
Multilingual 1Malaysian Kids
Fatimah Mohamed Arshad (2011). 1Malaysia: Raise multilingual kids, New Straits Times, 2 August. OR
HAVING multilingual children is the answer to the social integration that we desperately seek. Without a doubt, Bahasa Malaysia unites the races but not necessarily integrates them.
Integration requires more than just speaking in one language; it needs understanding and appreciating cultural differences and similarities. Rooted in each culture is the answer to prejudices and misconceptions that one harbours against another.
The "segregation" in our political and social life by ethnicity is still rampant though there are areas where we are one. 1Malaysia is truly an appropriate semantic -- be it in meaning and intention. What's lacking is how it should be done.
One small step that may lead to a giant advantage is to teach our children the languages that we have in the country. Children, unlike adults, are fast learners. They are able to master five or more languages.
Currently, our children can master at least two languages (among Malays) and three (among Chinese and Indians). The Malays are at a disadvantage here as they only know their mother tongue and English, while their counterparts can master their native language plus Bahasa Malaysia and English.
So, going from three to five languages is no big deal.
Language is more than just a window to knowledge; it's a gateway to appreciating the diversity of cultures, religions and ways of life.
These languages, for instance Arabic, Chinese and Hindi/Tamil, are as old as their history. They are the institutional memories of each culture embedded in the vocabularies and semantics. Yet, we deny our children these rich languages when they are there in our lives every day.
A mono-view of culture is closing the opportunities of exploring minds and paradigms. Opening up this spectrum to young minds will teach them that diversity is a way of life. It enriches their minds, and seeds of understanding and appreciation are planted at an early age.
With this exposure, facing a multi-ethnic environment will not be an alien experience later in their adult life. They will be able to assimilate easily and there will be fewer prejudices. Networking will no longer be tough for them. With this skill, they, too, will become agile workers or professionals in the international arena.
The role of languages in breaking down prejudice cannot be underrated. Why a certain behavioural pattern is prevalent in an ethnic group can be explained if we understand their culture.
Biases, misunderstanding and most of all, ignorance, can be minimised while promoting integration naturally. This can be done by introducing these languages at school with ease and minimal cost. Inculcating inter-racial understanding at a young age is the best investment towards racial integration in this country.
Diversity, as in nature, means simply richness -- like our multicultural society in Malaysia. It is a rich fabric of cultural heritages and histories. But this beauty is yet to be tapped.
Our plural mix of ethnic groups, which should be seen as wealth, appears as an incurable boil every now and then, depending on the health of our economy, and most important of all, the political game played by politicians.
Has any one asked why, after a half century of independence, few of us are able to speak the languages of our ethnic counterparts (with the exception of Malay language), when we could have mastered them easily with will?
It's hard to believe that after staying together in one house for more than 50 years, the Chinese and Tamil languages sound strange to the Malays' ears. The tones of these languages may sound familiar, but most Malays don't have a clue what they mean. This is a sad loss, even if one hides under the disguise of nationalism.
Diversity in ethnicities/culture and languages is our unique asset. It should be used to spread our wings to the east and west of the globe.
Each language has its own market. Some foreigners have pointed out that Malaysia is not capitalising fully on its unique strength of multi-ethnicity.
That is, Malaysia has Chinese-speaking entrepreneurs to conquer business in China, Indian-speaking businessmen to invest in India, and English-speaking professionals to enter into the world market. And the country's Islamic image is an edge in the Middle East.
It's good to have this kind of specialisation, but these are not integrated.
Let's plant the seeds of integration in our children now by taking the baby step of teaching them to be multilingual in a one Malaysia environment.
Read more: 1Malaysia: Raise multilingual kids http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18mayai/Article#ixzz1U0WuAuGQ
HAVING multilingual children is the answer to the social integration that we desperately seek. Without a doubt, Bahasa Malaysia unites the races but not necessarily integrates them.
Integration requires more than just speaking in one language; it needs understanding and appreciating cultural differences and similarities. Rooted in each culture is the answer to prejudices and misconceptions that one harbours against another.
The "segregation" in our political and social life by ethnicity is still rampant though there are areas where we are one. 1Malaysia is truly an appropriate semantic -- be it in meaning and intention. What's lacking is how it should be done.
One small step that may lead to a giant advantage is to teach our children the languages that we have in the country. Children, unlike adults, are fast learners. They are able to master five or more languages.
Currently, our children can master at least two languages (among Malays) and three (among Chinese and Indians). The Malays are at a disadvantage here as they only know their mother tongue and English, while their counterparts can master their native language plus Bahasa Malaysia and English.
So, going from three to five languages is no big deal.
Language is more than just a window to knowledge; it's a gateway to appreciating the diversity of cultures, religions and ways of life.
These languages, for instance Arabic, Chinese and Hindi/Tamil, are as old as their history. They are the institutional memories of each culture embedded in the vocabularies and semantics. Yet, we deny our children these rich languages when they are there in our lives every day.
A mono-view of culture is closing the opportunities of exploring minds and paradigms. Opening up this spectrum to young minds will teach them that diversity is a way of life. It enriches their minds, and seeds of understanding and appreciation are planted at an early age.
With this exposure, facing a multi-ethnic environment will not be an alien experience later in their adult life. They will be able to assimilate easily and there will be fewer prejudices. Networking will no longer be tough for them. With this skill, they, too, will become agile workers or professionals in the international arena.
The role of languages in breaking down prejudice cannot be underrated. Why a certain behavioural pattern is prevalent in an ethnic group can be explained if we understand their culture.
Biases, misunderstanding and most of all, ignorance, can be minimised while promoting integration naturally. This can be done by introducing these languages at school with ease and minimal cost. Inculcating inter-racial understanding at a young age is the best investment towards racial integration in this country.
Diversity, as in nature, means simply richness -- like our multicultural society in Malaysia. It is a rich fabric of cultural heritages and histories. But this beauty is yet to be tapped.
Our plural mix of ethnic groups, which should be seen as wealth, appears as an incurable boil every now and then, depending on the health of our economy, and most important of all, the political game played by politicians.
Has any one asked why, after a half century of independence, few of us are able to speak the languages of our ethnic counterparts (with the exception of Malay language), when we could have mastered them easily with will?
It's hard to believe that after staying together in one house for more than 50 years, the Chinese and Tamil languages sound strange to the Malays' ears. The tones of these languages may sound familiar, but most Malays don't have a clue what they mean. This is a sad loss, even if one hides under the disguise of nationalism.
Diversity in ethnicities/culture and languages is our unique asset. It should be used to spread our wings to the east and west of the globe.
Each language has its own market. Some foreigners have pointed out that Malaysia is not capitalising fully on its unique strength of multi-ethnicity.
That is, Malaysia has Chinese-speaking entrepreneurs to conquer business in China, Indian-speaking businessmen to invest in India, and English-speaking professionals to enter into the world market. And the country's Islamic image is an edge in the Middle East.
It's good to have this kind of specialisation, but these are not integrated.
Let's plant the seeds of integration in our children now by taking the baby step of teaching them to be multilingual in a one Malaysia environment.
Read more: 1Malaysia: Raise multilingual kids http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/18mayai/Article#ixzz1U0WuAuGQ
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Minnut innit galleria
Dali and his friends are exhibiting their art work in the above gallery. The gallery concept proposed is non-conventional; it doesn't have the luxury of ample space but the ambiance is informal and cozy. It utilises a former office set up to present the artwork creatively. The walls are the canvas for the gallery. The space is small but rich in presentation. A total 22 artists participated with 175 artworks ranging from digital art, photographies, short videos, canvas paintings and sculptures.
Its creativity at work. A must see.
Kudos guys.
xxxxxxxxx
http://minutspaceinit.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=10286&id=100001772430880#!/profile.php?id=100001772430880&v=wall
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Hanya Shamrin
Pujaan saya. Alfatihah dan doa kasih. Dalam kenangan semuanya - lunak suara, penghayatan kepada lirik dan lagu, cintanya kepada irama, lagu dan seninya, ketampanannya.Hanya Shamrin (101111).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
